The trend towards increasing complexity of systems and applications is driving the adoption of more effective monitoring tools. In this context, Datadog stands out as a powerful and versatile tool.
What are the main features of Datadog and why do companies choose this paid SaaS monitoring in the world of open source and free software? Let’s figure it out.
The main factors we focused on are:
We will try to elaborate on each of them. Let’s start with the features of Datadog that have kept it at the top of the monitoring tools for several years and also conduct a brief comparison with the Prometheus-Loki-Grafana stack.
For monitoring, it is enough to install an agent on the host and/or add the library in the application. The user-friendly interface and dashboards with key metrics save a significant amount of time at the initial stage. Moreover, Datadog has simplified integration with Microsoft Azure, making it even more attractive compared to Prometheus-Loki-Grafana. The latter requires initial configuration for collaboration and additional setup of exporters.
Drag-and-drop widgets allow the creation of custom views without the need for coding. The visualization toolset allows data to be viewed in various formats and enables report creation.
A significant advantage is the ease of query creation, unlike Prometheus. In Datadog, everything is quickly and easily configured through the UI (often, Datadog even suggests potential queries, or metrics that already provide the required information, such as cpu_usage – a metric that returns the percentage of CPU usage).
Datadog Database Monitoring supports both self-hosted and cloud versions of Postgres, MySQL, Oracle, and SQL Server. The “Query Metrics” dashboard displays the historical performance of normalized queries. It allows visualizing performance trends using infrastructure or custom tags, such as data center availability zones, and provides alerts for anomalies.
Datadog also supports functionalities like:
A key feature is Datadog’s ability to monitor cloud versions of databases, a capability absent in PLG. In such cases, separate services like AWS CloudWatch or Azure Monitor would be necessary.
Datadog provides solutions for monitoring AWS Lambda, Azure App Service, Azure Container Apps, and Google Cloud Run with features including:
This point is noteworthy as Datadog integrates with Kubernetes, Docker, containerd, and Istio, allowing:
Datadog offers robust monitoring capabilities for real-time tracking of various components’ performance. This includes server status monitoring, network activity, application response times, etc.
Synthetic tests allow observation of how systems and applications operate using modeled queries and actions from around the world. Datadog monitors the performance of web pages and APIs from the server-side to various network levels (HTTP, SSL, DNS, WebSocket, TCP, UDP, ICMP, and gRPC) in a controlled and stable manner, alerting about malfunctions.
Despite all the capabilities of Datadog, there are aspects that should not be overlooked when choosing and implementing this solution.
The log analysis process in Datadog is more complex than it should be. While you can send logs to Datadog, analyzing them proves challenging. If you want to analyze logs, you need to index and store them, which comes with a separate pricing structure for reception and storage. Due to complexity and cost structures, some organizations prefer not to store as many logs as they might need or want. This leads to challenges in troubleshooting and root cause analysis, especially for persistent issues that continue beyond the storage period.
To index and analyze logs, they need to be extracted from cloud object storage (e.g., Amazon S3) and reanalyzed. This process can take several hours and requires someone to manage it. Due to a constant shortage of specialists and an excess of work for DevOps and site reliability teams, many organizations cannot handle this level of complexity.
Regarding logs, Datadog charges $0.10 USD for data ingestion and from $1.06 USD (3 days) to $2.50 USD (30 days) for storage. To store logs for a longer duration, you need to contact Datadog and negotiate individual prices, which can quickly escalate as your company scales. While Datadog is useful for monitoring and detection, when it comes to root cause analysis and issue resolution, these costs can quickly spiral out of control.
Reducing log retention periods can be a significant compromise, resulting in a loss of visibility into more complex issues—from prolonged performance problems with applications and infrastructure to persistent security threats. Many startups, starting with Datadog, discover that as they scale, they eventually spend absurd amounts of money on log retention. With scaling, Datadog becomes more expensive and challenging to use. Datadog has made a name for itself as a monitoring tool for startups due to its quick and easy setup. However, as projects grow, it becomes more expensive and challenging to use.
However, the ability to monitor serverless applications, k8s clusters and databases, and the use of AI in analyzing metrics and logs, makes Datadog undoubtedly one of the most modern and popular SaaS applications.